If the individual is not read precisely, we cannot understand his behaviour as a group or mass. Above all, we must know the archetypes of his associative and behavioural motivations. Until today, science has always been talked about in society; however, by now we see a society which questions and discusses everywhere, and makes political determinism for itself. Therefore, society is prevalent everywhere (the ecologists, the consumers, the users, agreed or moral principles, base community, votes). Nowadays the most deterministic fact is that society constitutes itself priority over whatever else is valued. In fact, society is to be understood in science, in economy etc. This means that conducts and thematics of research, service and verification will not be run and selected by experts, but by civic local delegates, who will discretionize universities and scientific commissions according to opinions however diverse in reality. A new dictatorship of the many is categorized “in prevarication of the best ones”: “you are good if I appreciate you, because by now I represent the people my way”. The group constitutes the system for the system. If A. Comte used to declare sociology as the most positive science, and neglected psychology only because it was still in its infancy, John Stuart Mill affirms that the fundament of the sciences is within psychology. Especially today, once psychological science, through the ontopsychological school, has found the ontological nexus able to authorize knowledge founded on reality, sociology must update itself of this ontological nexus, if it wants to read and foresee social man’s behaviour with predictable results.
